Last Updated: August 22 2026
How can I defend a careless driving charge in Ontario if I received a ticket or charge under section 130 of the Highway Traffic Act?
Careless driving under the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 130 turns on whether the Crown can prove you drove “without due care and attention” or “without reasonable consideration for other persons” in the circumstances, and for the more serious version, whether bodily harm or death resulted ( ) if you’re facing careless driving or careless driving causing bodily harm or death, VP Legal Services & Notary can help Ontario drivers review the disclosure, assess what the officer or witnesses relied on, and build a defence plan with a paralegal and notary workflow designed to protect your rights and reduce avoidable outcomes. Call (437) 286-1499 to discuss next steps and your potential penalties, including fines, demerit points, licence suspension risk, and, where injuries or death are alleged, much higher exposure.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
The law treats the driving offence of careless driving very seriously. Generally, the offence is charged when the operator of a vehicle, typically, among other possibilities, the driver of a motor vehicle, fails to operate the vehicle to the standard expected of an "ordinary prudent driver". A secondary careless driving charge, treated very harshly by the law, may arise when the operator of a vehicle fails to operate the vehicle to the standard expected of an "ordinary prudent driver" and the consequences involve death or injury.
Note: For immediate help, please contact VP Legal Services & Notary by phone at: (437) 286-1499 to retain services or to discuss any specific questions that you may have.
The Law
What Legally Constitutes As Careless Driving?
The offence of careless driving is a relatively vague yet broadly applicable charge. Specifically, the offence of careless driving as within the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8 states:
Careless Driving
130 (1) Every person is guilty of the offence of driving carelessly who drives a vehicle or street car on a highway without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway.
Penalty
(2) On conviction under subsection (1), a person is liable to a fine of not less than $400 and not more than $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than six months, or to both, and in addition his or her driver’s licence or permit may be suspended for a period of not more than two years.
Careless Driving Causing Bodily Harm or Death
(3) Every person is guilty of the offence of driving carelessly who drives a vehicle or street car on a highway without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway and who thereby causes bodily harm or death to any person.
Penalty
(4) On conviction under subsection (3), a person is liable to a fine of not less than $2,000 and not more than $50,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years, or to both, and in addition his or her driver’s licence or permit may be suspended for a period of not more than five years.
Deemed Lack of Reasonable Consideration
(5) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (3), a person is deemed to drive without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway if he or she drives in a manner that may limit his or her ability to prudently adjust to changing circumstances on the highway.
Sentencing — Aggravating Factor
(6) A court that imposes a sentence for an offence under subsection (3) shall consider as an aggravating factor evidence that bodily harm or death was caused to a person who, in the circumstances of the offence, was vulnerable to a lack of due care and attention or reasonable consideration by a driver, including by virtue of the fact that the person was a pedestrian or cyclist.
Whereas the offence of careless driving is vaguely defined as conduct that is "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons", the common law, per actual court cases, is required to provide the defining substance of what is meant by "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons". Examples for review may include:
- Whether reading a report in preparation of a morning meeting while commuting to work is "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons"?
- Whether applying makeup is "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons"?
- Whether glancing at a map while trying to navigate an unfamiliar city is "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons"?
- Whether two-handed eating while steering with knees is "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons"?
- Whether changing a radio station is "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons"?
What Is the Legal Meaning of Due Care and Attention?
To determine what actually is "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons" requires something more than just assessing whether some form of driving imperfection occurred. Instead, the assessment requires a hypothetical review of the conduct an "ordinary prudent driver" faced with similar circumstances. This basis for determining what actually is "without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons" was stated by the Court of Appeal within the precedent setting case of R. v. Beauchamp, 1952 CanLII 60 which is frequently cited and relied upon within more recent cases such as occurred within the case of York (Regional Municipality) v. Lam, 2017 ONCJ 290 wherein it is said:
[28] In determining the requisite standard of care and skill required of a motorist facing a charge of careless driving, I look to the often cited Ontario Court of Appeal judgment, R. v. Beauchamp, 1952 CanLII 60 (ON CA), [1953] O.R. 422, in which the standard is not one of perfection. Instead, Justice MacKay, writing for the Court, sets out the appropriate legal test as follows:
… It is whether it is proved beyond a reasonable doubt that this accused, in the light of existing circumstances of which he was aware or of which a driver exercising ordinary care should have been aware, failed to use the care and attention or to give to other persons using the highway the consideration that a driver of ordinary care would have used or given in the circumstances? The use of the term “due care”, which means care owing in the circumstances, makes it quite clear that, while the legal standard of care remains the same in the sense that it is what the average careful man would have done in like circumstances, the factual standard is a constantly shifting one, depending on road, visibility, weather conditions, traffic conditions that exist or may reasonably be expected, and any other conditions that ordinary prudent drivers would take into consideration. It is a question of fact, depending on the circumstances in each case. [Emphasis added.]
Vehicle Defined Broadly
Can a Person Riding a Bicycle Be Charged With Careless Driving?
It is notable that the offence of careless driving as prescribed within section 130 of the Highway Traffic Act, per the above, may be charged upon the operator of a "vehicle" which is much broader than sections of the Highway Traffic Act that apply only to circumstances involving a "motor vehicle". As section 1 of the Highway Traffic Act includes bicycle, among other things, within the definition of "vehicle", it is possible that a person riding a bicycle, among other things, can be charged with the offence of careless driving. Specifically, "bicycle" and "vehicle" as per the Highway Traffic Act are defined as:
“bicycle” includes a tricycle, a unicycle and a power-assisted bicycle but does not include a motor assisted bicycle;
“vehicle” includes a motor vehicle, trailer, traction engine, farm tractor, road-building machine, bicycle and any vehicle drawn, propelled or driven by any kind of power, including muscular power, but does not include a motorized snow vehicle or a street car;
Penalties
What Are the Consequences Upon Conviction of Careless Driving?
A careless driving conviction, being the generalized careless driving offence as provided by section 130(1) of the Highway Traffic Act as opposed to the careless driving causing death or injury charge as provided by section 130(3) of the Highway Traffic Act, involves potentially very serious penalties. Upon conviction, the driver is subjected to a fine ranging between $400 and $2,000 plus a victim surcharge and six (6) demerit points. There is also the possibility of a license suspension for a maximum period of two (2) years as well as jail for a maximum of six (6) months. Additionally, a convicted driver will likely face very significant insurance rate increases.
Learn More About Careless Driving Charges...
Here are links to two (2) other webpages:
NOTE: A significant volume of online queries, such as “lawyers nearby” or “top lawyer in,” frequently indicates a desire for prompt, competent legal assistance rather than a certain job title. In Ontario, the same Law Society that governs lawyers also regulates licensed paralegals, granting them the authority to represent clients in specified litigation cases. Core functions of this role include advocacy, legal assessment, and procedural expertise. VP Legal Services & Notary provides legal representation within its permitted scope, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and persuasive advocacy to attain efficient and positive outcomes for clients.
